
Central Texas is adding patients, physicians and clinics faster than most billing teams can keep up. Patriot MedBill audits your charts and inpatient DRGs so documentation stays defensible as Medicare Advantage plans, Medicaid managed care organizations and employer plans look harder at every claim.
Medicare Advantage Ready
Documentation that withstands plan reviews
Coding Accuracy Focus
CPT, ICD-10 and HCPCS tested
STAR and CHIP Rules
Texas Medicaid managed care policies applied
Inpatient DRG Checks
Groupings rebuilt from the record

Austin's growth shows up in the chart. New residents arrive with tech-employer coverage, ACA Marketplace plans or Medicaid. Seniors are moving from traditional Medicare into Medicare Advantage. Clinics in Travis, Williamson and Hays counties are hiring physicians who learned to document somewhere else. Each of these shifts changes who reviews your claims and what they expect to see in the record.
Patriot MedBill offers Medical Chart Auditing and DRG Review in Austin to hospitals, specialty clinics, surgery centers, primary care groups and behavioral health providers. We read the documentation, compare it with the codes billed, regroup inpatient stays to confirm the DRG, and report what is putting revenue or compliance at risk.
Our auditors are part of Patriot MedBill's Houston-based team. They support Austin practices remotely, working inside the EHR/PM and payer portals you already use, so your staff does not have to export charts or learn another system.
Austin's payer mix is shifting every year. Audit priorities here follow the growth: more plan-level reviews of inpatient diagnoses, more Medicaid managed care rules, and a steady stream of new providers whose documentation has never been checked against Texas payer policy.
As more Austin seniors enroll in Medicare Advantage, more inpatient claims face plan-level DRG validation and clinical validation reviews. Plans commonly challenge a CC or MCC when the chart lacks clinical indicators supporting the diagnosis.
Growing Medicaid and CHIP enrollment means more claims under STAR, STAR+PLUS and STAR Kids managed care. Each plan layers its own coding and documentation policies on top of TMHP rules.
Austin's tech workforce is covered by UnitedHealthcare, BCBS of Texas, Aetna, Cigna, Humana and Sana Benefits plans, many of them self-insured. Payment integrity programs and coding policies differ from plan to plan.
Independent orthopedic, cardiology, surgical and concierge practices keep opening around the city. Procedure coding, laterality and modifier rules make specialty claims a frequent source of both underpayments and audit exposure.
Rapid hiring across Travis, Williamson and Hays counties brings physicians trained in other systems and states. Their E&M level distribution and diagnosis specificity often need a baseline review in the first months.
Austin has seen strong growth in behavioral health and virtual care. Session time, add-on codes and Texas telehealth billing rules all depend on what the note actually records.
Pick the reviews that match your risk. Most Austin engagements start with one focus area and widen once the first findings are in.
Inpatient cases are regrouped from the record to confirm that principal diagnosis, CC/MCC capture and procedure codes support the DRG billed to Medicare, Medicare Advantage or commercial plans.
We confirm that each reported diagnosis is backed by clinical indicators in the record, the question Medicare Advantage plans raise most often when they dispute a complication or comorbidity.
Baseline E&M reviews for physicians who recently joined an Austin practice, comparing their level distribution with documented medical decision-making or time.
CPT and HCPCS review for orthopedic, cardiology and surgical encounters, including laterality, modifiers and bundling rules that commonly cause specialty underpayments.
Coding is compared with TMHP guidance and the policies of STAR, STAR+PLUS, STAR Kids and CHIP plans so Medicaid claims hold up when an MCO reviews them.
Uncaptured secondary diagnoses, undocumented-but-performed procedures and undercoded visits are identified while there is still time to correct and resubmit.
Psychotherapy duration, add-on codes, place-of-service codes and telehealth modifiers are checked against the session note.
The method is the same for a five-physician clinic and a hospital service line. Only the sample size and focus areas change.
We learn your specialties, payer mix, recent denials and any payer letters or records requests, then agree on the questions the audit should answer.
Charts are selected by provider, payer and code family, with extra weight on new physicians, Medicare Advantage inpatient stays and high-volume procedures.
Auditors read each encounter and compare it with the claim, applying the payer policy that governed the date of service.
Hospital cases are regrouped from documentation alone to test principal diagnosis, CC/MCC support and discharge status.
We walk your leadership and providers through the findings, ranked by compliance risk and revenue effect, with specific documentation and coding corrections.
Smaller follow-up samples confirm the corrections are working and catch new patterns as your practice adds providers.
Audits are only useful if they change what happens on the next claim. Here is what Austin organizations can expect from a review with Patriot MedBill.
Recurring code and documentation mismatches are fixed at the source instead of appealed one claim at a time.
Records that answer the questions Medicare Advantage and Medicaid plans ask during a review.
Inpatient, outpatient, surgical and behavioral health coding reviewed by auditors who know each area.
Recurring reviews keep pace as new clinics open and new physicians join.
Findings are shown chart by chart so physicians see exactly what to document differently.
From hospital service lines to independent clinics, our reviews adapt to the documentation rules of each specialty.
As a Medical Chart Auditing and DRG Review Company in Austin practices can call on remotely, we review charts for organizations across the metro and throughout Travis, Williamson and Hays counties, such as:
✔ Hospitals with Medicare Advantage and commercial inpatient volume
✔ Independent orthopedic, cardiology and surgical clinics
✔ Ambulatory surgical centers
✔ Primary care and pediatric practices with STAR and CHIP patients
✔ Behavioral health and telehealth organizations
✔ Growing groups onboarding new physicians
Comparing Texas markets? We also cover medical chart auditing and DRG review for Dallas providers and chart audits and DRG review in San Antonio. The Houston chart auditing and DRG review page explains the service in full.
For day-to-day support after an audit, see medical coding in Austin, Austin insurance verification and revenue cycle management in Austin.
Traditional Medicare claims are reviewed by Medicare contractors such as RACs and MACs. Medicare Advantage plans run their own payment integrity programs and often apply DRG validation and clinical validation directly, sometimes before payment. Austin hospitals with growing MA volume need documentation that supports each CC and MCC on its own merits.
Yes. We compare your coding and documentation with TMHP guidance and the policies of the managed care plans you bill. That helps primary care and pediatric practices spot the issues that cause MCO denials and recoupments before the plan does.
A baseline review in the first few months is a sensible step. It shows whether a new provider documents E&M levels and diagnosis specificity the way Texas payers expect, and it is far easier to adjust habits early than after a payer flags a pattern.
Self-insured plans are typically administered by carriers or third-party administrators that run their own claim edits and payment integrity reviews. The rules vary by plan, so our audits check documentation against the policies that apply to the patient’s coverage.
Pricing depends on the number of charts, the specialties involved and whether inpatient DRG validation is included. We confirm scope during a free consultation and provide a quote before any work begins.
No. Our Houston-based team works remotely inside your existing EHR/PM and payer portals with role-based access. Patient records stay in your systems throughout the audit.
ASCs usually start with procedure coding accuracy, modifier use and bundling, along with a review of operative reports for missing detail. Those areas tend to drive both underpayments and payer questions for surgical claims.
Share your specialties, payers and recent denial trends, and we will recommend a starting scope for your review. There is no obligation, and your records stay in your own systems.

What Is DRG Review in Medical Billing — And Why It Matters for Hospital Reimbursement
Learn what DRG review is in medical billing, why DRG errors happen, and how a structured review process protects hospital reimbursement accuracy and compliance.

Medical Chart Auditing: How Healthcare Providers Can Catch Coding Errors Before a Payer Audit Does
Discover how proactive medical chart auditing helps healthcare providers identify coding errors, reduce compliance risk, and stay prepared before insurance payer audits begin.

How Medical Chart Audits Reduce Claim Denials and Recover Lost Revenue
Find out how medical chart audits identify coding errors that cause claim denials, recover underpaid reimbursements, and build a stronger revenue cycle.